This entire thread is based on a false premise: that SYRUP still exists in the conversion contract. It does not.
Governance voted, executed, and drained the conversion pool. That was the point. Reopening would require minting new SYRUP — which was never approved, and doing so now would amount to a retroactive dilution of all active holders.
Let’s be clear:
This isn’t about fairness — it’s about rewriting executed governance.
No reputable DeFi protocol mints post-facto tokens to cover user negligence.
The SSF allocation was passed through governance. It was public, clear, and final.
Calling this “appropriation” is manipulative.
You didn’t lose your tokens. You failed to act during multiple windows, including an extension.
Passive investing isn’t punished — but it’s also not protected from finalized supply shifts.
If your tokens are now worthless, that’s a consequence of opting out of active participation.
Governance is not a refund desk.